A propos de l’OMC

On 4 October 2000, India requested consultations with the United States concerning: final affirmative determinations of sales of certain cut-to-length carbon quality steel plate products from India at less than fair value by US Department of Commerce (DOC) on 13 December 1999 and affirmed on 10 February 2000; interpretation and use of provisions relating to facts available in the anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations by DOC; and determination and interpretation by the US International Trade Commission (ITC) of negligibility, cumulation and material injury caused by the said Indian steel imports. India considered that these determinations are erroneous and based on deficient procedures contained in various provisions of US anti-dumping and countervailing duty law. According to India, these determinations and provisions raise questions concerning the obligations of the United States under the GATT 1994, the Anti-Dumping Agreement, the SCM Agreement, and the Agreement establishing the WTO (WTO Agreement). India considered that the provisions of these agreements with which these measures and determinations appear to be inconsistent, include, but are not limited to, the following: Articles VI and X of the GATT 1994; Articles 1, 2, 3 (especially 3.3), 5 (especially 5.8), 6 (especially 6.8), 12, 15, 18.4 and Annex II of the Anti-Dumping Agreement; Articles 10, 11 (especially 11.9), 15 (especially 15.3), 22 and 27 (especially 27.10) of the SCM Agreement; Article XVI of the WTO Agreement.

El 29 de mayo de 2002, la OMC hizo público el informe del Grupo especial sobre el caso “Comunidades Europeas - Denominación comercial de sardinas”.

El 25 de mayo, la OMC distribuyó el informe del Grupo Especial encargado de examinar el asunto “Canadá — Medidas que rigen la venta de vino” (DS537), planteado por Australia.

Le 9 août 2010, l’OMC a publié le rapport du Groupe spécial qui avait examiné la plainte de la Nouvelle-Zélande dans l’affaire “Australie — Mesures affectant l’importation de pommes en provenance de Nouvelle-Zélande” (DS367)-

On 21 August 2012, Japan requested consultations with Argentina concerning certain measures imposed by Argentina on the importation of goods. Japan challenges: (i) the requirement to present for approval of a non-automatic import licence: Declaración Jurada Anticipada de Importación (DJAI); (ii) non-automatic licences required in the form of Certificados de Importación (CIs) for the importation of certain goods; (iii) requirements imposed on importers to undertake certain trade-restrictive commitments; and (iv) the alleged systematic delay in granting import approval or refusal to grant such approval, or the grant of import approval subject to importers undertaking to comply with certain allegedly trade-restrictive commitments.

Le 28 octobre 2011, l’OMC a publié le rapport du Groupe spécial chargé d’examiner la plainte de la Chine dans le différend Union européenne — Mesures antidumping visant certaines chaussures en provenance de la Chine (DS405).

El 20 de septiembre de 2006, la OMC hizo público el informe del Grupo especial sobre el caso “Estados Unidos - Medidas relativas a la reducción a cero y los exámenes por extinción”.

El 12 de marzo de 1998, la OMC hizo público el informe del Grupo especial sobre el caso “Comunidades Europeas - Medidas que afectan a la importación determinados productos avícolas”.

El 09 de diciembre de 2002, el Órgano de Apelación hizo público el informe sobre el caso “Estados Unidos - Medidas compensatorias sobre determinados productos de las CE”.

On 12 July 1999, the WTO issued the dispute panel reports in the case "European Communities - Measures concerning meat and meat products (hormones) - Original complaint by Canada".