1996

Abstract

This paper compares the solution methods and baseline calibration of three different quantitative trade models (QTMs): computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, structural gravity (SG) models and models employing exact hat algebra (EHA). The different solution methods generate identical results on counterfactual experiments if baseline trade shares or baseline trade costs are identical.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/25189808/234
2019-03-08
2022-01-22
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/25189808/234
Loading
  • Published online: 08 Mar 2019
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cud3RvLWlsaWJyYXJ5Lm9yZy8K